Political Unrest, Insurrection Powers and Crypto: Asset Safety When Governments Turn to Force

When the state turns to force: Can crypto protect your savings during political unrest?

Hook: If you worry about fast-moving crackdowns, account freezes, or soldiers on the streets — you’re not alone. For investors and everyday citizens in 2026, political unrest is no longer a remote headline: it's a liquidity, custody, and safety problem that can destroy life savings in hours. This article evaluates whether cryptocurrency is a viable financial hedge when governments invoke emergency or insurrection powers — and gives practical, legally prudent steps to protect assets and move value under pressure.

The most important takeaway, up front

Crypto can be part of an emergency asset plan, but it is not a magic safe haven. On-chain assets are powerful for rapid cross-border mobility and remittances, yet they carry unique legal risks: custodial seizure, compelled disclosure, on-chain traceability, and frictioned off‑ramps. The right strategy combines technology (hardware wallets, multisig, privacy-aware flows), jurisdictional diversification, and a legally informed emergency plan ready before crisis hits.

Context: Why this matters in 2026

Late 2025 and early 2026 reinforced a new reality: governments are more willing to use extraordinary powers during domestic unrest. In January 2026, a U.S. presidential threat to invoke the Insurrection Act focused public attention on what “domestic deployment of troops” might mean for civil liberties and everyday transactions. International forums like Davos in 2026 highlighted geopolitical fragmentation, supply-chain security, and the intersection of digital finance and state power.

At the same time, the last three years have seen:

• More targeted sanctions and export controls that complicate cross-border movement of value.
• Heightened exchange compliance and KYC enforcement — raising the likelihood exchanges freeze accounts under legal pressure.
• Wider availability of non-custodial tools (layer‑2s, multisig, gas-optimised bridges) but also stronger blockchain analytics used by states to trace flows.

How governments can affect your crypto during unrest

Understanding the levers available to states helps craft realistic contingency plans. These avenues are distinct from but complementary to military deployments under the Insurrection Act:

• Legal compulsion and court orders: Exchanges and custodians can be compelled to freeze or disclose accounts using subpoenas, national security letters, or emergency injunctions.
• Sanctions and domestic economic powers: Emergency economic authorities allow blocking of cross-border payments, restricting foreign exchange access, and freezing assets tied to targeted individuals or entities.
• Physical interdiction: Hardware wallets and devices can be seized at checkpoints or during raids. In hostile environments, physical custody isn't safe without protective protocols.
• Communications and infrastructure shutdowns: Internet blackouts or network throttling make on-chain transactions difficult; state control of fiat rails can cut off exit options.
• Cyber measures: State-level surveillance and hacking can compromise software wallets and custodial platforms.

Case studies and lessons from recent events

Real-world incidents help separate theory from practice:

• Targeted freezes: In multiple countries over the past five years, exchanges complied with orders to freeze accounts tied to protest funding or sanctioned actors. That shows custodial platforms are first responders to state pressure.
• Hybrid responses in Russia–Ukraine (2022–24): Crypto enabled rapid fundraising and cross-border transfers for civil society, but actors also faced scrutiny and operational risk from sanctions and tracing tools.
• Capital control workarounds: In jurisdictions with strict FX controls, peer‑to‑peer crypto markets and remittance-focused stablecoins filled gaps — but participants accepted liquidity risk and often paid large spreads.

Can crypto be a hedge against state coercion?

Short answer: Sometimes. It depends on an investor's threat model, local legal environment, and operational readiness. Consider three scenario buckets:

1. Short-term civil unrest without targeted legal action

If the state deploys troops or law enforcement but doesn’t immediately target financial accounts, crypto provides fast liquidity and remittance options — assuming internet access. Non-custodial assets may be moved peer-to-peer or through DEXs for off‑ramp via local OTC networks.

2. Targeted freezes, sanctions or emergency financial controls

When authorities can and do compel custodians, the risk to custodial holdings is high. Non-custodial crypto remains available only if you control private keys and can transact under disrupted infrastructure.

3. Full infrastructure shutdown or martial law

If networks and borders are closed and courts rubber-stamp broad asset seizures, both fiat and crypto mobility suffer. Here, pre-positioned assets in safe jurisdictions and physical transfer plans (e.g., trusted agents, stored hardware wallets offshore) are critical.

Practical, actionable strategies: what you should do now

Below is a prioritized checklist designed for finance-minded readers who need operational clarity:

1. Define your threat model and legal boundaries

• Map plausible scenarios: protests, curfews, targeted sanctions, full emergency rule.
• Identify assets subject to seizure (bank accounts, custodial crypto, real estate).
• Consult a local attorney about laws that could compel disclosure or seizure — do this before a crisis.

2. Prefer non-custodial control — but prepare for physical risks

Why: Custodial exchanges are often the first point of leverage for states. Controlling private keys reduces the chance of third-party freezes.

• Use hardware wallets (Coldcard, Ledger, etc.) and keep them physically secure and concealed.
• Set up multisignature (multisig) wallets where keys are split across people or jurisdictions — a compromise reduces single-point failures.
• Plan for device seizure: don’t keep seed phrases or password lists on devices. Use metal seed plates and hidden caches.

3. Jurisdictional diversification

Keep a portion of assets accessible in more than one country or legal regime. This includes:

• Non-custodial wallets with keys held by trusted friends or professional key custodians abroad.
• Accounts with reputable, regulated custodians in stable jurisdictions (not all 'custodians' are equal — due diligence matters).
• Pre-funded stablecoin accounts or on-ramps in safe jurisdictions to speed exit.

4. Pre-position fiat off-ramps and remittance routes

Cryptocurrency is most useful when it can be turned into usable local or foreign fiat quickly.

• Establish relationships with vetted OTC brokers and remittance services that operate peer-to-peer in your region.
• Keep emergency funds in stablecoins on chains with low fees (think Layer 2s) and on-ramps with known liquidity.
• Test the flow: go through a dry run of converting a small amount to cash using your planned route.

5. Privacy and traceability — trade-offs

Privacy tools (coin mixers, privacy coins) can help evade surveillance but carry substantial legal and compliance risk. In 2026, many jurisdictions treat use of obfuscation tools as red flags for money laundering.

• Use privacy tools sparingly and only after legal advice. They can complicate future compliance and increase the risk of asset seizure.
• Prefer operational privacy practices: creating new addresses, avoiding reuse, and minimizing linkage between personal KYC profiles and on-chain holdings.

6. Build an emergency playbook and rehearsals

Write a one-page Emergency Asset Playbook and practice it twice a year. Include:

• Who holds each key and how to reach them.
• Pre-approved OTC counterparties and local cash-out channels.
• Legal counsel contact and a list of consular resources (if you might cross borders).

Specific technical setups to consider in 2026

Below are advanced options favored by security-conscious traders and small institutions in recent years. They require setup and trust agreements.

Multisig across jurisdictions

Use a threshold wallet (e.g., Gnosis Safe) with signers in separate countries. Time-delay modules give precedents time to react to forced signings.

Pre-signed emergency transactions

Store pre-signed or partially-signed transactions with trusted parties so value can be moved if direct access is cut. Extreme caution: pre-signed transactions can be dangerous if keys leak.

Smart-contract vaults with timelocks

Contracts that implement withdrawal delays and multisig can reduce the chance of coercive forced transfers. Not foolproof — but adds friction for abusive actors.

Use of regulated offshore custodians

For larger balances, licensed custodians in jurisdictions with strong rule-of-law provide legal protections that can be enforced in courts abroad. Expect KYC and slower withdrawal timelines.

Legal risks and compliance realities

Two hard realities limit crypto’s usefulness as a sovereign-proof asset:

1. Regulatory reach: States can compel entities within their jurisdictions to act; large exchanges and payment processors will comply. If an exchange in your country is ordered to freeze, on‑chain holdings you control may escape direct seizure, but converting them to cash becomes hard.
2. Criminalization risk: In some regimes, possession of foreign currency or cross-border transfers can be criminalized during emergencies. Be careful: what begins as a financial safety move can be construed as evasion.

Before relying on privacy tools or moving large sums, get legal advice tailored to your jurisdiction and facts.

Remittances and family safety

For families needing to send money out during unrest, crypto remittances are often the fastest route — if both sender and recipient know how to use wallets. Practical steps:

• Train relatives on simple non-custodial workflows (hardware wallet basics or custodial accounts in safe jurisdictions).
• Use stablecoins bridged to local peer‑to‑peer markets to reduce volatility and spread costs.
• Maintain a small cash buffer and local trusted network for final-mile physical pickups.

What institutions and pros are doing

We spoke with crypto custodians, compliance officers, and security practitioners in late 2025 (background briefings). Common institutional practices include:

• Diversifying custody between regulated custodians and multisig cold stores.
• Maintaining pre-approved fiat corridors in low-risk countries to enable rapid off‑ramp if clients need to move funds.
• Using enhanced transaction monitoring and legal teams to evaluate emergency orders before compliance teams act.

Red flags: when crypto may not help

Be skeptical if your plan relies on any of the following:

• Assuming exchanges will facilitate rapid withdrawals during national emergencies.
• Expecting privacy tools to grant immunity from prosecution or civil forfeiture.
• Relying on untested OTC counterparties without legal agreements or reputation history.

"Crypto shines at speed and openness, but those same properties make it visible. Safeguarding value under state pressure is an operational problem, not a purely technical one." — Security practitioner (summary of interviews, 2025)

Emergency checklist: 12 steps to implement in the next 30 days

1. Create an Emergency Asset Playbook and store encrypted copies with multiple trusted contacts.
2. Move a defined emergency stash to a non-custodial hardware wallet you control.
3. Set up a 2-of-3 or 3-of-5 multisig with geographically separated signers.
4. Open accounts or relationships with at least one regulated custodian in a stable jurisdiction.
5. Identify and vet two local OTC or remittance partners; do a small test transfer.
6. Train family members on wallet basics and produce a simple one-page emergency flowchart.
7. Back up seed phrases in metal and store copies in separate secure locations.
8. Document legal counsel and consular contacts; keep contact cards offline.
9. Maintain a small cash reserve and a plan for physically moving hardware wallets across borders.
10. Run a dry‑run conversion of 1–2% of assets from crypto-to-cash using planned channels.
11. Review privacy practices and consult counsel before using obfuscation tools.
12. Rehearse the plan twice a year and update it after major political events.

Final assessment: realistic expectations for 2026 and beyond

In 2026, the world is more fragmented and faster-moving. Crypto offers unique advantages in speed, censorship resistance, and programmable transfers — making it a useful tool in an emergency asset toolkit. However, it is not a legal panacea. Custodial exposure, on-chain traceability, and state authority to exert pressure mean the most effective plans blend crypto know-how with legal preparation and physical logistics.

If you treat crypto as a component of a broader emergency strategy — not a sole solution — you’ll gain meaningful protection against many, but not all, forms of state coercion.

Call to action

Prepare now: download our Emergency Asset Playbook (free) and run a 60‑minute tabletop rehearsal with your family or team this month. If you manage significant sums, schedule a legal and security consultation to build a bespoke, jurisdiction-aware plan. Subscribe to our newsletter for weekly briefings on political risk, custody best practices, and remittance channels — practical intelligence for keeping value safe in uncertain times.

Related Reading

• Marc Cuban’s Bet on Nightlife: What Investors Can Learn from Experiential Entertainment Funding
• Build vs Buy: How to Decide Whether Your Next App Should Be a Micro App You Make In‑House
• Step-by-Step: Connecting nutrient.cloud to Your CRM (No Dev Team Needed)
• From Stove Top to Scale‑Up: Lessons from Small‑Batch Syrup Makers for Italian Food Artisans
• Make Mocktails for a Pound: DIY Cocktail Syrups on a Budget